Diagnostic

Technology Readiness Audit

Ten questions. Five minutes. One uncomfortable answer.

Most technology projects in sport do not fail on the technology. They fail because software was implemented on top of a process nobody had examined, which automates the confusion and makes it faster and harder to see.

This audit asks the questions I ask at the start of an engagement — about how your operation actually works, how well your last discovery went, and whether anyone can say what the software is supposed to be worth.

You get your score and a breakdown on screen before you are asked for anything.

What you get

Your readiness score across five dimensions, on screen immediately
Which dimension is holding you back, and why that one matters most
A written assessment from me, if you want one

What it measures

Process clarity: You can describe how the work actually happens today, and you know which parts were designed rather than accumulated.
Discovery quality: Your last discovery told you something you did not already believe, and the people doing the work were in the room.
Value case: You know what the change is worth, by a margin wide enough that nobody has to be persuaded.
Vendor and delivery accountability: Your vendors ask uncomfortable questions before quoting, and someone owns the outcome rather than the deliverable.
Automation governance: Anything automated has a defined scope, permissions that match it, review, and a named person accountable for its output.

10 questions, scored out of 30. Your result appears on screen as soon as you finish — no email required to see it.

Question 1 of 10Process clarity

Take a core process in your organisation. Can you say why it is still done that way?

Not what it does — why it is still shaped like that.