Services
Pathways, coaching systems and competition structures that hold up under scrutiny
Most development problems are not coaching problems. They are structural — a pathway with a gap in it, a competition calendar that works against the training year, or an analysis setup that produces reports nobody acts on.
This work starts by mapping what actually happens rather than what the strategy document says happens, then fixes the structure so the coaching can do its job.
Athletes drop out at a predictable stage and nobody can say exactly why. Usually a transition nobody owns.
Standards exist on paper but delivery depends on who happens to be in the room.
Performance analysis exists as a reporting exercise rather than something that changes a session plan.
Day rate
£900–£1,200 per day
Scoped as a review or a programme. Federation and NGB budgets are recognised in this band.
Availability
Flexible
Flexible, agreed per engagement and confirmed on a first-come basis once a start date is set.
Location
Remote-first
Remote-first. Face-to-face across the UK and EU is possible by arrangement.
National federations, regional bodies, academies and clubs — anyone responsible for a development pathway rather than a single squad.
A focused review of a single pathway stage is typically a few weeks. A full system review across age groups and regions takes longer and is scoped up front.
Yes. Structural recommendations that have not been tested against the people delivering them tend not to survive contact with a season.
Tell me the situation and the timing, and I will tell you honestly whether this is the right fit.
